| Server IP : 172.67.191.97 / Your IP : 104.23.243.197 Web Server : Apache/2.4.63 (Ubuntu) System : Linux adminpruebas-Virtual-Machine 6.14.0-37-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Nov 14 22:10:32 UTC 2025 x86_64 User : www-data ( 33) PHP Version : 8.4.5 Disable Function : NONE MySQL : OFF | cURL : ON | WGET : ON | Perl : ON | Python : OFF | Sudo : ON | Pkexec : ON Directory : /usr/share/doc/debianutils/ |
Upload File : |
/etc/shells micropolicy The expected audience of this is debian developers packaging programs meant to be used as login shells. /etc/shells is no longer a config file, but is maintained by the add-shell, remove-shell and update-shells programs. So, if a package contains something that the maintainer thinks ought to be a valid login shell, it can have its shell included in two different way. By placing a fragment in /usr/share/debianutils/shells.d/<binarypackage>, it will invoke a file trigger on debian-utils and invoke update-shells, which will add and remove the contained shells from /etc/shells as needed. Alternatively, it's postinst should, (on initial install only, to allow a sysadmin to take it out again), run: /usr/sbin/add-shell /path/to/shell In the postrm, probably on remove, the package should call /usr/sbin/remove-shell /path/to/shell The latter method has the disadvantage of shells disappearing from /etc/shells when the relevant package is removed but not purged and then reinstalled. The fragment method does not suffer from this limitation.